Rabbinic authority and personal autonomy essay

Rabbi Gil Student's "The Decline and Fall of Local Rabbinic Authority" calls for the principle of hakham she-asar ein hakham aher rashai le-hattiro when one authority prohibits another may not permit with regards to a davar kashehthe dynamic between humra addicts and kulla seekers on renegade blogs, R.

In denying Reform marriages, he concomitantly declares that where these occur there is no need for a Jewish divorce, thereby freeing many women IM EH 1: The point, then, that I made to Benny was that the statements he cites from actual texts of the Chafetz Chaim himself rabbinic authority and personal autonomy essay not really go as far as the oral shemuah.

It was their tone that stood out. As an example of the opinion that there either is no such thing now as Daat Torah which Jews committed to Torah are obliged to heed or, even if there is, that it has a very limited by the great sages of earlier generations authority, see the long essay by Lawrence Kaplan in Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy, rabbinic authority and personal autonomy essay in the previous footnote.

New Opportunities in a Post-Feminist Age. So just at the very end of my Tradition article, I decided to raise some issues about Daas Torah in a somewhat critical vein. Contrary to past standards, Jewish men and women as adults today have constant contact in the workplace and school environment.

Halakhic Decisions and Political Consequences. There was an exchange in The Journal of Halacha and Contemporary Society between me and Rabbi Alfred Cohen -- where if I understood him correctly, he proposed this type of scaled-down notion of Daas Torah [8].

Here Brown criticized me, and he was right. Although it is common practice to allow an author to respond to criticism in the same journal which finds fault with his thesis, no response by Kaplan appears in the Observer.

The Sanctity of the Synagogue. Part 4 examines The Odyssey Years: But in a different responsum IM OH 4: I wonder though if he made the statement publicly. But two vital commodities in all-too-short supply these days are humility and respect for elders. He forcefully argues this position in one particular responsum IM OH 4: When criticized for that permissive ruling, he responds with a strong defense IM YD 2: Now, with hindsight, we are wiser.

I never said that. Bibliography Angel, Marc D. But he was wrong. As Rav Dovid Cohen writes in his translated essay: Consistent with talmudic sources, Rabbi Feinstein accepts the notion that men have a greater capacity for distractions and need more restraint.

Of course, you have your own interpretation and cannot be completely objective, but still you try to give all the evidence, whether it supports your view or calls it into question, and try to be as fair as possible to opposing views.

In at least two not inconsequential respects, Rabbi Cohen brings full circle the public discussion about this topic that -- with respect to popular Jewish, English language periodicals and books -- first began 40 years ago with the publication of an article that appeared in The Jewish Observer.

Can I interject right there, though —the story is that a lot of askanim had a lot to do with this ban [12]. Boys and girls must be in separate buildings while they are studying.

All the other statements of the Chafetz Chaim were more general statements that a person who studies Torah is given insight into reality, can understand many things, etc. Its perimeter is a veritable wall when it comes to matters of marriage, worship, education and worldview.

This particular talmudic passage has really nothing to do with submitting to the directives of Torah scholars! Imagine, though, how the suggestion that forest fires be permitted to burn uncontrolled, would have been received had it been offered fifty years ago.

Maybe Rav Kamenetsky or Rav Belsky — they seem to have dissented from everybody else; they never retracted their haskamos. Anyway, getting back to what I was saying.

Steven Resnicoff

One of Rabbi Cohen's primary sources for the concept of "Daat Torah" is the portion in the gemara in Bava Batra 12a and the Rishonim -- especially the Ritva 6 -- explicating that "prophecy was taken away from the prophets" but not from the "chachamim" sages.

However, there is one condition attached: How can you disagree with the Gedolim, with Daas Torah? According to Rav Dovid Cohen, based on sources dating back to the Rama Mipanu and in reliance on verses in the Torah itself, there was a fusion between the crowns of Torah and Kingship, such that our sages assumed the authority of a king, much like Moshe Rabbeinu held both Torah and royalty titles.

Nothing personal or specie-istbut, in the end, only smarts can prevent mega-fires.Moshe Z. Sokol (ed.), ‘Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy’ The first question is discussed at length only by Moshe Sokol in the essay entitled: ‘Personal Autonomy and Religious Authority’; he notes that even the most dedicated follower of the Halakhah has numerous opportunities to make his own choices: in his family life, his.

Observations On And Beyond Rabbi Alfred Cohen's “Daat Torah” in “Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy” edited by Moshe Z.

Sokol (Aronson Press ). In both of his essays, within the context of a broader attack on the notion of “Daat Torah,” Professor Kaplan specifically questioned Rabbi Weinberger's depiction of the. Vol. 27 No. 4: Summer I Could Have Used Some Rabbinic Authority The Nature and Limitations of Rabbinic Authority by Eli Turkel The Parameters of Rabbinic Authority: A Study of Three Sources Sources by Aaron Cohen R.

Jacob Emden, Philosophy, and the Authority of Maimonides by Jacob J. Schacter Review Essay: Rabbinic Authority and. The first revisits three important themes raised in Orthodox Forums past including the impact of new voices (female, academic, and spiritual) on the traditional Beit Midrash, a reexamination of the tension between rabbinic authority and personal autonomy, and new perspectives on social justice and Tikkun Olam.

Michoel- please read the end of Dr. Lawrence Kaplan’s essay in the somewhat famous volume of the Orthodox Forum “Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy.” There is a very stark and well documented example of advice and consequences(and subsequent attempts at covering up the advice).

For general comments on the contemporary place of rabbinic authority in the public square, see, in addition to R.

A Lesson From Smokey

Lichtenstein's essay, my "Who Speaks for Torah-And How?".

Rabbinic authority and personal autonomy essay
Rated 0/5 based on 84 review